On Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:00:24 AM UTC-7, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:02:45 AM UTC+8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
>>> > Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib is certainly easier, but
>>> > IMHO not really appropriate since the former *builds* without the
>>> > latter.
>>> I don't see the problem.  What's the harm with the easy solution?
>>>
>>
>>  
>>
> Upgrading matplotlib would trigger a rebuild of cvxopt. In principle, if 
>> this rebuild is unnecessary (that is, if SAGE_CHECK is not set), then it 
>> could add a long time to the upgrade process. In practice, cvxopt is not a 
>> dependency for anything else, and building cvxopt doesn't take very long, 
>> so I think this is not an important concern.  
>>
> Is there any other reason to worry about the easy solution?
>>
>
> The question is: will anyone remember two years down the line why cvxopt 
> had matplotlib as a dependency?
>

If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the "deps" 
file...

-- 
John

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to