How much are these functions used in the Sage library?  I would be
supportive of removing them all if possible....
David

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 18:29, Starx <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This discussion stems from:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/979bdce4e002cd05/e8061b2ff21a4cdf?lnk=gst&q=is_AlgebraElement#e8061b2ff21a4cdf
> I decided it deserves it's own thread.
>
> The is_functions (is_Integer, is_AlgebraElement, ect) are depreciated
> and have been for 4 years now.  I think it's time some of them got
> deleted, but I'm not sure all of them should go.
>
> There are 260 functions defined in Sage of the form def is_Name(x)
> where Name starts with a capitol letter (I didn't count the cdef
> functions so there might actually be more).  Of those 110 of them
> simply return isinstance(x, Name) and I think those 110 can definitely
> be deleted in favor of users using isinstance(x, Name).  Deleting
> them, replacing all their calls with calls to isinstance, and all
> their imports with imports of Name is not something I'd like to do by
> hand, so I'm working on a little script.
>
> As for the other 150, some of them do the following:
>
> def is_Name(x)
>   return isinstance(x, Name_something)
>
> I didn't check but I suspect that there is a factory called Name which
> is why the _whatever is there.  Another example of this issue is that
> is_Cone(x) returns isinstance(x, ConvexRationalPolyhedralCone) and the
> function Cone constructs ConvexRationalPolyhedraCones.  I'm undecided
> on whether we should remove these is_functions as well.  Is the user
> expected to know that the factory is just a factory? and look through
> the source code to figure out what the class name is?
>
> Finally there are some is_functions that return something slightly
> more complicated then a single isinstance, for example
>
> def is_PrimeFiniteField(x):
>   some imports
>   return isinstance(x, FiniteField_prime_modn) or \
>          (isinstance(x, FiniteField_generic) and x.degree() == 1)
>
> I would probably just leave these alone but I think others who've been
> at this longer might have a better idea of what the best course of
> action is.  It seems to me that after 4 years they should either go or
> they shouldn't be depreciated.
>
> -Jim
>
> --
> Die Dunkelheit... leitet die Musik.
> Die Musik... leitet die Seele.
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to