John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> writes: > - Keshav has also proposed merging all of the repositories for the spkgs into > a single repository. This is also an interesting idea. How would that fit in?
Personally I would abandon SPKGs altogether. It never made sense to me that we have made up our own package management system when others already exist. So I would let SPKG repositories languish until we were able to switch to ebuilds - or some other similar system, potentially, but ebuilds / Prefix are the one I'm most familiar with, mainly because people are already working hard on it (i.e. lmonade and sage-on-gentoo). > It makes more sense to me to have a discussion about the general structure of > the repositories in the Sage distribution, rather than focus on one small > aspect of that: the version numbers of a few repositories. Why paint the bike > shed when we might just knock it down in a few months? I agree, actually. I posted a thread about this just now :) -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
