Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> writes: > You're right. In fact, bitbucket supports git as well. In many ways, > bitbucket is nicer than github, for example, the issue tracker is > better, in my opinion (bitbucket has priorities for tickets, for > example), and the display on bitbucket is much nicer (the information > is much more densely displayed, and helpful tree diagrams are out to > the side of commits), and bitbucket has threaded comments.
Atlassian is the developer of a quite nice bug tracking system called JIRA. Maybe they have been applying their expertise to bitbucket's collaborative systems. The issue tracker is definitely a lot better than github's issue tracker. > There are some things github does better, though. I can't recall them > off the top of my head, though. I find github to be a lot faster than bitbucket, for some reason, though maybe it's some consequence of being in Singapore. The main thing that github "does better" is probably to have a userbase about ten times the size of bitbucket, which means it's much more likely to find your current collaborators already on github than to find them already on bitbucket, and the same for discovering potential new collaborators. Another feature of github that I really notice to be missing on bitbucket is the network graph. Take a look at, for example, http://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/network/ . Nothing like this seems to exist on bitbucket, and it's really useful for keeping an eye on what other people are doing on the codebase. There are also various other minor wins for github, such as the ability to use reStructuredText on your wiki pages. -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
