On 2012-02-11 22:21, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le samedi 11 février, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit: >> On 2012-02-11 22:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> It could even work out of the box. There shouldn't be a problem >>> distributing apache/nginx linked against OpenSSL in the sage >>> tarball. >> Why not directly link to OpenSSL then? If you require people to have >> OpenSSL for apache/nginx, you might as well skip the extra step of >> apache/nginx. > > This isn't the same situation at all!
I think it pretty much *is* the same situation license-wise. You are just replacing the non-GPL openSSL by the non-GPL apache. But I am not a lawyer, so I won't bother discussing this further. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
