Alex is correct. I stand corrected. The header files that are a problem are part of libssl-dev. I did a quick read of their copyright license. Since it allows redistribution of source and binaries with acknowledgement, I'm not sure it is really incompatible with GPL, although their secondary license (yes they have two inconsistent ones) does not allow distribution under a GPL license. Still I see no problem with depending on the package as it is open source. I agree that distributing as part of Sage might be a problem.
Jonathan On Feb 11, 8:59 am, Alex Kramer <kramer.alex.kra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jason Grout > > <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > > So I'd support adding openssl-dev as a requirement of Sage. What systems > > does it come default on? I don't recall having a problem on OSX, for > > example. > > On Debian (and presumably Ubuntu as well), the correct package name > appears to be libssl-dev, not openssl-dev. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
