On 2012-02-08 16:37, David Kirkby wrote: > Unfortunately, due to what appears to be a bug with Pynac, importing a > lot of python modules, 64-bit binaries on Solaris do not run well. So, if I understand you correctly, Sage *builds* but it doesn't actually work properly? I actually meant "builds and runs as it should" with SAGE64=yes in my original question.
> So unless someone comes up with something better, I think SAGE64 should > not be altered. My main problem is testing SAGE64. If some new spkg breaks a SAGE64 build, nobody is going to notice. Most authors and reviewers (including me) are unable to test whether SAGE64 really works. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
