Well, I think that looks very useful.  I often get frustrated using
numpy in Sage, this looks like it would make quite a few things
easier.  So you get a +1 from me at least.

-Marshall Hampton

On Jan 27, 12:27 pm, Maximilian Trescher
<faucon.emeril...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
> I'm very new to the developers list.
> About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using sage
> regularly for some physical calculations.
>
> Three days ago I wondered if there is any possibility to create a
> "numpy-enabled" function from a sage's symbolic expression. But i
> couldn't find a solution.
> (Right: there is fast_callable, but it doesn't "eat" numpy arrays)
>
> So I came to an own solution, and thought it might be of interest for
> you. You can find it here:
>
> https://github.com/faucon/numpybuilder
>
> I would be happy to contribute this to sage, if you think there is a
> need for it.
>
> Cheers
> Maximilian
>
> PS:
> i know: the subfunctions are not yet fully documented, like described in
> the developer manual, and the mapping should be larger for general use.
> But these are things I would do only if there is interest in it ;-)

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to