Well, I think that looks very useful. I often get frustrated using numpy in Sage, this looks like it would make quite a few things easier. So you get a +1 from me at least.
-Marshall Hampton On Jan 27, 12:27 pm, Maximilian Trescher <faucon.emeril...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi @all, > > I'm very new to the developers list. > About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using sage > regularly for some physical calculations. > > Three days ago I wondered if there is any possibility to create a > "numpy-enabled" function from a sage's symbolic expression. But i > couldn't find a solution. > (Right: there is fast_callable, but it doesn't "eat" numpy arrays) > > So I came to an own solution, and thought it might be of interest for > you. You can find it here: > > https://github.com/faucon/numpybuilder > > I would be happy to contribute this to sage, if you think there is a > need for it. > > Cheers > Maximilian > > PS: > i know: the subfunctions are not yet fully documented, like described in > the developer manual, and the mapping should be larger for general use. > But these are things I would do only if there is interest in it ;-) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org