Le 27/01/2012 19:14, Volker Braun a écrit :
Instead of sprinkling "unsigned" around until it works,
Well, that's not exactly what happened.
Once it was recognized that the problem was that the code was using
"char" thinking it meant "signed char" and that was wrong (surprise!),
then I checked each use of "char" to see if it was meant to be a signed
or unsigned one, and added the appropriate keyword. It's only when I was
finished that I ran the test -- and got a positive result.
That means the test passes on my platform, and certainly on all others,
as a consequence of a deliberate fix, not a series of random changes
with a halting condition as you seem to assume.
I hope these precisions will calm your anxiety on the matter,
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
