Hi Jean-Pierre,
thanks a lot for looking into this.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Jean-Pierre Flori <jpfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way:
> - I used Burcin's patch, somehow I could not use Florent's one
> - The patch is based on pynac-0.2.2, but applies on 0.2.3
> Here is the output of the patch version
> sage: class bla(SageObject):
> ....: def __add__(self, other):
> ....: print "Add"
> ....:
> sage: m1 = bla()
> sage: m2 = bla()
> sage: a = x.ind[m1]
> sage: b = x.ind[m2]
> sage: a+b
> x.<class '__main__.bla'> + x.<class '__main__.bla'>
> sage: a+a
> 2*x.<class '__main__.bla'>
Your patch for pynac works great here. Starting from plain Sage-4.7.2
and pynac-0.2.3, doctesting the usual suspects
(sage/{symbolic,calculus,functions}) shows only a couple of printing
differences. Considering this change within the context of #9880, they
are mostly harmless. :)
I merged your patch in my pynac queue [1]. We'll have to sort out the
headers once #9880 is done and we're making the pynac release.
[1] https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pynac-patches/src
Florent, shall we create a temporary pynac spkg so you can carry on
with your work on indexed expressions?
Cheers,
Burcin
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
