On 26 Okt., 22:47, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't recall where and when, but we already had some discussion on
> > that, e.g. that files unknown to Mercurial ("? ...") should be ignored
> > when checking whether there are uncommitted changes. Keshav, John?
>
> In sage-devel in August (I hope this link works):
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/gxQFXjogxLI/discussion>
"If you are just interested in having a newer version of sage I
suggest you just install a new sage from scratch (either download a
binary or manually build source code release) since doing this will
take a lot less human effort then debugging the specific problems you
have with the upgrade process."
;-)
(Thanks, it does... This one, too:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/8314055e3a20c4b2/a622e7e3dc2d36eb
)
> I don't have time to work on this now, but if someone opens up a ticket,
> please cc me.
I'll perhaps tweak sage-sage and sage-update a little; changing all
sage*.spkg's spkg-install files is another story.
-leif
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
