On Oct 25, 2011, at 16:56 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:52:24 PM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is there an educated guess as to when/if sage will be ported to lion?
>> I foolishly upgraded when it came out and have been unable to use sage
>> since...
>>
>
> There is a trac ticket about this on which there has been some progress:
>
> <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11881>
>
> I don't know if anyone is actively working on it, but I agree that it is
> important and people should be. Meanwhile, I believe that binary versions
> of Sage for OS X 10.6 should work on OS X 10.7.
I do the same, with a build of 4.7 on 10.6.8. However, if I run the
'ptestlong' tests (on 10.7.1), I get failures in four files:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst #
2 doctests failed
sage -t -long -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py # 1 doctests failed
sage -t -long -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctests failed
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py # 6
doctests failed
The cvxopt and optimize failures are "lapack.so" lookup issues (names not
found); the other two are "expect/got" failures.
So, it works, but not perfectly.
HTH
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-at-Large
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML Email
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
