On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Marco Streng <marco.str...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 12:18 pm, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: >> Same here. So, I am +1 to your suggestion. > > Thanks, but what was my suggestion? > > I didn't write it very explicitly in that message, but I guess I > argued for going back to the old behaviour completely. If people > object to that, then an alternative suggestion is to go back to the > old behaviour for attach and to keep the high performance for load.
There was some good reason for making the change (it fixed a bug?), so somebody should look into that, right? I'm pretty sure *I* made the change, but I can't remember why at this moment. -- william > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
