On Tuesday, September 6, 2011 4:47:22 PM UTC+2, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > Actually that post highlights quite well our motivations for switching > development model from a library on top of a system (as was > MuPAD-Combinat w.r.t. MuPAD) to a bunch of patches, most of whom are > intended to be eventually merged in the system (Sage-Combinat on top > of Sage). > > Interesting. For completeness, did the motivations turn out to be valid? I.e. is the current model with staying more closely updated with sage more workable then the situation with MuPad. I'm really interested to hear your personal experiences on this front.
> Cheers, > Nicolas > -- > Nicolas M. Thi�ry "Isil" <nth...@users.sf.net> > http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ > > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
