On 5 Sep., 14:13, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 5 Sep., 13:12, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > x if n==1...
>
> Oops...
>
> > To be precise, I can propose that
> > x^0 should be 1, (and not int(1)), then
> > x^n := x*x^{n-1} for n>0,
> > and then multiplication result will a Sage Integer.
>
> Right, that would be sound.
BU**SH**.
Who would take the one-element from a different domain (or choose it
to be of different type)?
(I've made some comments on the ticket, also suggesting to put this on
sage-devel, without noticing there had been already this thread. A
back-reference from the ticket wouldn't have been bad.)
The "funniest" thing is the current behaviour of int(3)^CC(-3) or even
int(3)^CC(3) .
-leif
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
