> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > > On 2011-08-02 19:09, William Stein wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There is now a "high priority wishlist" of bugs/issues to work on for > >> Sage Days 32 (Bug Days): > >> > >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/days32/wishlist > > > > In this list, I notice two tickets on which the "Sage community" does > > not agree whether the patch is really what we want, i.e. whether the bug > > is really a bug: #8896 and #10231. > > > > Why are these on the high-priority list? > > Because the funder of the workshop put them there. They are by four > our top "paying customers", and I want to provide good service by > putting time into deciding further about those tickets (and working on > all the others). > I would be quite happy for #10231 to go in. I already started to enforce it when possible in sage-on-gentoo but it would be nice if it mirrored things in sage itself. I note the upgrade of mpfr and mpfi. I should point out to my test results. mpfr-3.0.x breaks at test on linux-x86 (haven't checked on OS X) no idea why: https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/13 I haven't checked if there has been a new release since mpfi-1.5 but it gives some strange results, mpfi-1.4 is safe (but requires a patch for mpfr-3): https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/30
Francois This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments. Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more information. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org