On 1 Aug., 21:41, "Justin C. Walker" <jus...@mac.com> wrote: > On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:43 , rjf wrote: > > > This may be more appropriate for sage-flames, > > +1
-1 > > but maybe not? +1 As I have pointed out in another thread, I am against having an abundance of small lists. I am not a lawier, but it seems to me that court decisions about patents on GPL software are of potential relevance for a GPL-licenced project. Hence, I am against moving it. Ceterum censeo it is easy enough to ignore a single thread on sage- devel, if one believes that it is not interesting. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
