On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:44:01 kcrisman wrote:
> On Jul 29, 4:20 pm, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, July 29, 2011 9:16:10 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
> > > More seriously, it would be helpful to know "how official" such non-
> > > releases are.
> > 
> > Not at all official.
> 
> Right, but it would also seem that it is unwise to (say) try to add
> functionality on top of 4.7.1.rcx when tickets for overlapping code
> say "merged in 4.7.2.alphay".  So, at least while Jeroen is release
> manager (which very happily seems to be an ongoing thing!) they must
> have some additional status than someone else's random fork-y 4.7.2,
> right?
> 
> So it would be helpful to have some clarification, if only to avoid
> rebasing.
> 
What I did last time I had a problem like that was to make my ticket dependent
of the ticket already in the unofficial release. That way there is an explicit 
dependency chain.

Francois

This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not
guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message
and any attachments.

Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more
information.

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to