On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:44:01 kcrisman wrote: > On Jul 29, 4:20 pm, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, July 29, 2011 9:16:10 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > More seriously, it would be helpful to know "how official" such non- > > > releases are. > > > > Not at all official. > > Right, but it would also seem that it is unwise to (say) try to add > functionality on top of 4.7.1.rcx when tickets for overlapping code > say "merged in 4.7.2.alphay". So, at least while Jeroen is release > manager (which very happily seems to be an ongoing thing!) they must > have some additional status than someone else's random fork-y 4.7.2, > right? > > So it would be helpful to have some clarification, if only to avoid > rebasing. > What I did last time I had a problem like that was to make my ticket dependent of the ticket already in the unofficial release. That way there is an explicit dependency chain.
Francois This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments. Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more information. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org