Hi William, On 14 Jul., 05:55, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think people will have some issues with including an spkg that > replicates functionality available probably in code already in Sage, > with sufficient work.
>From my perspective, your last line is decisive: I would probably not easily be able to make Sage full use of LinBox - my C++ knowledge is rather limited, and I know nothing about LinBox. So, in order to use that for my project, I would have to wait for other people doing the work. Moreover, my benchmarks seem to indicate that *for the purpose of my project* MeatAxe performs relatively well (unfortunately not compared with Magma, as it seems). > Every single spkg that is added to sage > increases the maintenance work of Sage a lot. Removing spkg's later > is very hard. OK. Then I'll probably proceed as I did with my old cohomology spkg: I'll use MeatAxe, but not as a separate spkg. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
