All sparse polynomials are implemented within Sage, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_generic_sparse.  It would be good if the
constructor only used the implementation as part of the key for dense
polynomials.
David

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:37, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> When constructing a polynomial ring, one can provide arguments
> "sparse" and "implementation". But it seems that there is no sparse
> version based on NTL implementation:
>
>  sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ, sparse=False, implementation='NTL')
>  sage: R.is_sparse()
>  False
>  sage: R
>  Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring (using NTL)
>  sage: S.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ, sparse=True, implementation='NTL')
>  sage: S.is_sparse()
>  True
>  sage: S
>  Sparse Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
>
> So, S is sparse, but the implementation is not mentioned (so, it seems
> to be the default, i.e. FLINT).
>
> However, providing "implementation" is not ignored, it is used for the
> cache key:
>  sage: T.<x> = PolynomialRing(ZZ, sparse=True)
>  sage: T
>  Sparse Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
>  sage: S is T
>  False
>
> Question 1:
> What is the underlying implementation of S? Is it NTL, as requested?
>
> Question 2, if the implementation of S is based on FLINT (the
> default):
> Should the "implementation" argument be silently ignored, so that "S
> is T" in the example above?
> Or should an error be raised instead ("explicit is better than
> implicit")?
>
> If the answer to question 1 is that it does use NTL, then of course it
> should be mentioned in the string representation.
>
> Best regards,
> Simon
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to