On 5/5/11 2:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
manually keeping track of known failures is cumbersome and more likely to let in new failures in the files "known to fail."
One possibility is to use nose for tests like these, and put these "known to fail" tests in a separate file. Numpy/scipy base their "known to fail" tracking on nose, for example.
Again, in this case, I think the "known to fail" test should be moved upstream to numpy, since we are calling a numpy routine in this case.
Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
