Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> writes: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Martin Rubey > <martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de> wrote: >> Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> writes: >> >>> On 13 Apr., 15:53, Martin Rubey <martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de> >>> wrote: >>>> > 2) The spyx file gets a header prepended, meaning that the #cython ... >>>> > pragmas are not at the top of the file anymore, and so are not >>>> > applied. (Similar issues happen with __future__ imports). >>>> >>>> ... How >>>> could I circumvent 2)? >>> >>> Just guessing: Use .pyx instead of .spyx, if that is possible in your >>> case? >> >> I just tried this, but it makes no difference. Thank you anyway for the >> hint! >> >> Is there a way to check that a given function is profiled? I'll try to >> make it artificially expensive.. > > If it's being profiled, it should show up in the stats. Is profiling > set up on _home_martin_martin_TeXSource_Mathematik_configs_spyx_13?
Please bear with me - what would that mean? Yes, the first line of /home/martin/martin/TeXSource/Mathematik/configs.spyx contains this # cython: profle=True But I didn't do anything else. What should I do? Thanks again, Martin PS: the experiment shows that it is *not* profiled. The called subroutine shows up (a call to is_prime(largenumber)), but not the function itself... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
