On Tuesday, April 5, 2011 8:13:17 AM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote: > > Ah, it seems that you do not actually want expert mathematicians who > are not expert coders to contribute code to Sage. >
You are missing the point of this thread; its not at all about Mike R tripping over one of the numerous C++ pitfalls. I don't doubt that his program is great at what it does, and its awesome that he shares it with us. The issue is what I see as a failure of the Sage review process where some code that doesn't seem to be ready for public consumption was shoehorned into a library. Ideally, one of the Sage developers who works in that field would team up with the upstream author and polish lcalc. This would be both a service to Sage and the mathematical community. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
