I agree with the second point. This information is useful. On Feb 21, 10:07 pm, "D. S. McNeil" <dsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > (1) I just started playing with this stuff, and found queues much > nicer than cloning; it's worth It might be good to add a few > explanations to the page of what to do in common-screwup cases (at > least for me): e.g. unapplying everything (even though there are > uncommitted changes), undoing an accidental qrefresh, etc. Probably > my revert process is inefficient. > > (2) Having just spent some time tracking down a bug which was > apparently fixed relatively recently (someone borrowed Guido's time > machine, I guess! :^) it might be worth mentioning right at the start > in the "Modifying Sage source code" section which revision developers > typically work from, with a link to sage-release > andhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/. [Thanks @ncohen.] > > Doug > > -- > Department of Earth Sciences > University of Hong Kong
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
