Le 05/02/2011 20:08, Francois Bissey a écrit :
> Le 05/02/2011 11:44, Francois Bissey a écrit : > > So gamma could be called from C, Cython, possibly mpmath, pynac or > > maxima. I guess you could tests the results calling from mpmath or > > maxima. I am guessing that SR(10.0r).gamma() will end up being a call to > > maxima to compute gamma but I could be completely off track. But since > > it is also a gamma computation it could be related to the previous > > computation of gamma(6). > > Look at the last comments in the bug : I'm supposed to have tracked what > was called exactly... but it turns out it leads to a correct-functioning > function :-( > You asked if you missed something in the ticket. My suggestion is to try the various gamma to see if one matches the results you get. If so you may have missed something in the chain. It's a kind of reverse thinking.
Uh... that looks like a brute-force attack to the problem, which although guaranteed to work, is definitely inefficient.
Isn't sage deterministic? It must be possible to know exactly what is called when a command is typed!
Doesn't anybody know what happens!? Snark on #sage-devel -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
