Hi pang! On 18 Jan., 09:52, pang <pablo.ang...@uam.es> wrote: > That would be a greater confusion: we'd have the Sage layer, and > underlying that you wouldn't have neither python 2 nor python 3, but a > mixture.
Or you could argue the other way around: Currently, we have the layer of Sage `Integer`s and the layer of Python `int`s, both are supposed to model integer numbers, but both behave totally different with respect to division. However, I am not +1 to the suggestion of __future__ importing division. Some people (including myself, thus, the set is non-empty) sometimes use Python `int`s on purpose *and* use that the division is floor division. On the other hand, eventually we will have Python 3.*, and thus why should I not get used to write int(i/j) instead of i/j, for `int`s i and j? So, I am not -1 either. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
