On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:38, emil <emil.widm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If this proves stable I would recommend to consider that >> binary packages should be patched this way. > > I think that's definitely something we should look into! Could you > post a bash script? What somebody also has to check is, if it is still > possible to do development. i.e. apply some patches, changing cython > files, sage -b and then checking it again.
+100 There would have to be *significant* savings before I would want to make it so people would have to download a new version of Sage to create patches and otherwise develop Sage. Also, would this make editing files and not doing sage -b have effects? - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
