"> I don't know if you have ever seen Richard's review of Mathematica: > > http://www.math.bme.hu/~jtoth/FelsMma/mma.review.pdf > > but it is one of the most negative, biased "papers" I've ever seen. I'd like > to > know if some of his criticisms are true or not, but the paper is so biased, > that > I would not trust anything it says."
Biased or not, it is extremely thorough and brings some valid criticisms about the language. I think a similar review for Sage, if constructive, could be very useful. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
