I got G < H to alternately evaluate to true/false, for maybe half dozen trials, then it went to many true. My GUESS is that it is either due to some"residue" in something uninitialized, or a bug - which could also be an uninitialized issue ...somewhere.
On Nov 28, 1:35 am, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > Hi John, > > On 27 Nov., 22:37, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm completely confused about the following behavior: > > So am I. I only found an __eq__ method, but no __cmp__ or __richcmp__, > even though there is a _richcmp and _richcmp_helper. Can you test if > these _rich... methods are called? > > Cheers, > Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
