On Nov 27, 10:03 am, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote: > huh? you seem to be answering a question from some other thread...
Are you confused because I didn't post on sage-polemic -- I mean sage- flame? Yes, I started a new thread because the topic had changed. You are quite fond of pointing out topic changes on sage-polemic. >From the Google Web Interface, if one changes the topic within the same thread (instead of starting a "new post"(new thread); then subsequent replies to older posts keep the old topic, though usually carry some of the new topic as well. Please top post a reply, and we can have Dave chime in on that too. :-) > why don't you just look at the copyright info. > It says > > Bulk copying,reproduction, or redistribution in any form is not > permitted. > > http://dlmf.nist.gov/about/notices#S4 Because the central point that Robert Dodier made is that it should be in the public domain as it was funded with federal money (not sure if that's necessarily true); but since I'm interested in such an eventuality, that's why I would want to ask them for a formal explanation on public record. FOIA requests get answered by lawyers, not webmasters. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
