On 2010-11-11 18:43, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > No. GPLv2+ - compatibility is a weaker requirement than the GPLv2 - > compatibility. > Just as x>=2 is weaker than x=2.
Probably we are using the word "compatibility" in a different way. Essentially what I wanted to say is the following: If Sage claims that all the code it contains can be licenced under GPLv2+, then it cannot contain GPLv3 (or GPLv3+) licenced code. So I think the following still holds: either 1) the requirement "spkgs must be able to be released under GPLv2+" must be removed 2) we release Sage under GPLv3+ 3) we remove all GPLv3+ code from Sage Personally, I would go for 2). Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
