On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Worth a ticket? > > I think so. But perhaps I think there should be at least two separate > tickets. One ticket for fixing the long doctesting issue in exactly > one file in the Sage library. Ideally that file should only contain > one such long doctesting issue. Such a ticket would be a very good > candidate for any new contributor who wants to get involved in Sage > development. We need to advertise this ticket to potential or new > contributors. The other ticket(s) would address the long doctesting > issues in the remaining files.
It's a good idea to make this an easy way in for a new contributor. the ticket should say specifically that (for doctesting that one file) the patcher should give timings for doctesting that file before and after, with & without -long. I don't know which should be the one file to single out though! John > > -- > Regards > Minh Van Nguyen > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
