> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Regarding fortran, for a "Microsoft Visual C++" version of Sage, I > >> > will just get rid of Fortran (and Lisp) entirely, and not bother with > >> > building anything currently in Sage that depends on them... > >> > >> My thoughts about fortran oscillate as well. If I have the option, I > >> try to just use Python + Cython. > > > > For current Sage needs, though, the reason for Fortran is Scipy and R, > > correct? (Maybe PolyBoRi?) > > The Sage packages that directly depend on Fortran are: R, f2c, > lapack, blas, numpy, scipy, cvxopt: > > deep:sage-4.5.3 wstein$ grep FORTRAN spkg/standard/deps > $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) \ > $(INST)/$(R): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(PYTHON) $(INST)/$(ATLAS) > $(INST)/$(ICONV) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(FORTRAN): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(PYTHON) > $(INSTALL) "$(SAGE_SPKG) $(FORTRAN) 2>&1" "tee -a > $(SAGE_LOGS)/$(FORTRAN).log" $(INST)/$(F2C): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(LAPACK): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(BLAS): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(NUMPY): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(PYTHON) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(F2C) \ $(INST)/$(SCIPY): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) > $(INST)/$(F2C) \ > $(INST)/$(CVXOPT): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(FORTRAN) $(INST)/$(F2C) > > Note that numpy can be built and used *without* fortran, e.g., when I > removed fortran from psage I kept numpy... > I can be more precise than that. numpy needs fortran if you include lapack support, lapack is a pure fortran library. Support for lapack in numpy is optional.
So, if I am not mistaken, it just means you have lapack-less numpy. Francois -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
