On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2010-10-21 22:49, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> (so I can just look at the code and say "yes," or *easily* try >> it out.) > > Sorry but what's preventing you from *easily* trying it out today? I > personally have one separate Sage setup on sage.math.washington.edu > which I use solely for testing tickets. Using hg queues it's very easy > to push a patch, test it and pop it again so you're ready for the next test.
Given the difficulty of finding reviewers, are you arguing we shouldn't try to make things even easier? Yes, it's not to bad ([copy the url, qimport, qpush] * n, build, test, run doctests, qpop, ...), but could be a lot better. Oh, and by "test" I mean not doctests, but interactively test, where it's more of a pain to context switch and wait for the build to complete. I'd rather be reading the code and say "hmm... I wonder if this works..." and just try it out. - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
