On 2010-10-19 18:35, Roman Pearce wrote: > On Oct 19, 9:09 am, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, let's keep in mind that notebook servers with fewer users are >> usually very snappy and a great resource. It's not CPU power, but >> number of simultaneous users, I think. > > That suggests the bottleneck is disk I/O. Not even that is the bottleneck.
I have no idea of how the notebook is implemented, but I think that's really where the problem lies. Probably that code is not written with a large number of users (even non-simultaneous) in mind. Because a *second* notebook on the same physical server is much faster than the first. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
