On 10/11/10 07:14 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2010-10-11 00:40, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
IMHO, something that touches so many files, that's not a bug fix but
just renaming a command, has a fairly large risk/benefit factor.
It's true that it's not a bug fix by itself, but it prepares the way for
#9678 which will certainly fix bugs.
I'm afraid that if my patch #10115 gets merged in sage-4.6.1.alpha0
there are going to be much more merge conflicts (because it does in fact
touch that many files).
Jeroen.
What's the justification for merging it now, rather than merging it at the same
time as #10115? I appreciate it will touch a lot of files either way, but it's
usually better not to do that as we enter a feature freeze stage.
--
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
