> I don't remember if we discussed it already Minh, but what about > putting all these informations INSIDE of the docstrings instead ? We > could then generate the list of corespondances... It would be way > easier to maintain, and users could find the Sage equivalents to the > commands they know though search_doc (?)...
Ooops sorry, it looks like everybody was already agreeing on putting it inside the docstrings way before I arrived :-D Now, dear Sphinx experts, is there any "good" way to to it ? We already have a lot of "sections" (INPUT, OUTPUT, ALGORITHM, sometimes COMPLEXITY, EXAMPLES and TESTS) : should we add something like "EQUIVALENTS" containing "Matlab = ....., Mathemetica = ..." etc ? Would something else be easier to parse afterwards ? Nathann -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
