On 08/25/2010 07:08 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> spkg/standard/deps shows:
> 
> $(INST)/$(CLIQUER): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(SCONS)
>         $(INSTALL) "$(SAGE_SPKG) $(CLIQUER) 2>&1" "tee -a
> $(SAGE_LOGS)/$(CLIQUER).log"
> 
> 
> but as far as I can tell, there is no such dependency.
> 
> Cliquer is a standard bit of C, with a simple makefile.
> 
> Does anyone know why cliquer might depend on SCons? I suspect it is a
> mistake, but there might be some obscure reason I can't think of.
> 
> I know there was one bit of Sage, where someone got fed up with SCons
> and removed a SConscript  file and replaced it by a Makefile. Was that
> cliquer? If so, that would probably explain the unnecessary
> dependency.

According to

http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b4b3cd38f7c5e473/1bfcc79ef1e721dc?q=cliquer+scons+group:sage-devel#1bfcc79ef1e721dc

Minh Van Nguyen did the replacement.  See

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:3
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:25
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:30
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7057#comment:1

Can you open a ticket?

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to