On 08/25/2010 07:08 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > spkg/standard/deps shows: > > $(INST)/$(CLIQUER): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(SCONS) > $(INSTALL) "$(SAGE_SPKG) $(CLIQUER) 2>&1" "tee -a > $(SAGE_LOGS)/$(CLIQUER).log" > > > but as far as I can tell, there is no such dependency. > > Cliquer is a standard bit of C, with a simple makefile. > > Does anyone know why cliquer might depend on SCons? I suspect it is a > mistake, but there might be some obscure reason I can't think of. > > I know there was one bit of Sage, where someone got fed up with SCons > and removed a SConscript file and replaced it by a Makefile. Was that > cliquer? If so, that would probably explain the unnecessary > dependency.
According to http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b4b3cd38f7c5e473/1bfcc79ef1e721dc?q=cliquer+scons+group:sage-devel#1bfcc79ef1e721dc Minh Van Nguyen did the replacement. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:3 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:25 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681#comment:30 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7057#comment:1 Can you open a ticket? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org