On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Harald Schilly
<harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 4:58 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
>> .. if the difference between experimental
>> and optional could be clarified.
>
> Personally. if I could define it, I would use these definitions:
>
> 1. standard: that's well tested, included in each distribution,
> essential, and the responsibility of the Sage project that they work.
>
> 2. optional: that's some addition to sage that is supported by the
> sage project (more or less), but if it builds on all systems or not is
> not an issue. It should follow some defined standards, everybody who
> wants to improve one of it has to go through trac+review to do so and
> there should be a matrix on which systems one of these packages is
> expected to work. If requested, some of them may be promoted to
> "standard", as it already happened more than once.
>
> 3. experimental (which I would rename to "contributed"): this is a set
> of packages a user has created, it is not supported by the sage
> project, but only by one or more maintainers who are the only ones who
> are responsible for it. they might not work on all systems, they might
> not work at all, but most importantly, they bypass the trac+review
> process.
>
> The reason why I wish there is this 3rd category is that for example
> the openopt package that i've created, it is up for review (#7708) for
> more than 6 months. That's longer than the release cycle. If it won't
> work somewhere, I would try to fix it and take the responsibility if
> it is wrong or faulty. I don't see the benefit of still providing a
> really outdated version of it (officially) while not pushing this
> updated version.
>

I think I'm personally happy with the above definitions.

William

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to