PS: On 26 Jul., 11:52, Simon King <simon.k...@nuigalway.ie> wrote: > To my understanding, it is the correct way.
That said, working at #9583, the impression came accross that "#define Kstd1_mu mu" in some Singular header resulted in a segfault on t2 when Kstd1_mu was used in some Cython file. But if I understood correctly, the final verdict was that the linker messed up a variable mu in PARI with the mu of Singular. Fortunately, the next Singular version will replace mu by Kstd1_mu, so, this wouldn't be a problem anymore. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
