On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <novos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Carl, > > For example this installation of sage-4.5.alpha1 > > novos...@sage:/scratch/novoselt/sage-4.5.alpha1/devel/sage-main$ hg > qapplied > trac_9502_basis_parent_bug_in_FreeModule.patch > trac_9128-sphinx_links_all-fh.patch > trac_9128-intersphinx_python_database-fh.patch > trac_9188_fix_facet_normal.patch > trac_9188_fix_facet_normal_reviewer.patch > trac_9062_add_support_for_toric_lattices.patch > trac_9062-cmp_fix.2.patch > trac_8986_add_support_for_convex_rational_polyhedral_cones.patch > trac_8986_cmp_fix.patch > trac_8987_add_support_for_rational_polyhedral_fans.patch > trac_8987_add_enhanced_cones_and_fans.patch > trac_8987_review_changes.patch > trac_8987_repr_changes.patch > trac_8987_cmp_fix.patch > trac_8988_add_support_for_toric_varieties.patch > > shows two broken doctests in symbolic/random_tests. Moreover, it seems > that my doctest patch does not fix one of the issues anymore! It will > be very very good if you could fix this issue, as I have no idea > what's going on...
Thanks, that's exactly what I needed to track down the issue. Turns out it was a bug in random_tests.py. (I was inadvertently depending on the order of the output of .values() on a dict, which is a Bad Idea. The question isn't why it broke, it's why did it ever work.) There's a patch up at #9514. Carl -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
