On 15 July 2010 12:29, François Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz> wrote: >> In my email above, I just appended '$(INST)/$(GLPK)' to the end of the >> CVXOPT line as it currently is in spkg/standard/deps.. I did not add >> NUMPY myself. If a dependency can be removed, it would be useful, as >> it might permit more efficient parallel builds. > > sorry Dave, I didn't imply you did. I just noticed it on the dependency > list you quoted and thought it was odd and then checked. > > Francois
No problem. There are a few changes that could be usefully added to 'deps' 1) SAGETEX does not show a dependency of BASE. It is implied by a long chain rule, but it is unique in being the only package not to show this more explicitly 2) R does not show a dependency to FORTRAN - though again it is implied by a very long chain rule. 3) GLPK should be built before R if we ever hope to use it in R 4) GLPK should be built before CVXOPT if there is any hope of using those together. 5) If what is said in this thread is correct, NUMPY should be removed as a dependency of CVXOPT. 6) William has agreed GNU patch can be added, so that needs the 'patch' package installed. I've built the 'patch' package. If nobody beats me to it, I'll sort these issues out when I add GNU patch. Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
