On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > I think indexing into operands by number is a bit brittle, and > x.operands()[2] is much more explicit.
On the other hand, then you get expressions like x.operands()[0].operands()[2].operands()[1].operands()[0] which are a bit unwieldy especially since none of the later .operands() tab-complete. One is more likely to need a deeper call of operand calls the index calls. --Mike -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
