On 06/30/10 01:02 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Tim Daly<d...@axiom-developer.org>  wrote:
I'm surprised you don't use patch.
Mercurial can generate patches.

The issue is not generating the patches -- it's applying them.  All of
the spkgs (should) have the diff as well as the file with the patch
applied.

--Mike



I can't myself see what we gain having the diff and the modified version. Even if we stick to using 'cp' (which is a bad idea in my opinion), I would much rather create the diff myself if I want to see it.

Experience tells me that if there is a file called 'diff' it is quite likely an old one which someone has not updated. So I personally never trust their contents - I'd just rather create it myself if I need it. Since they can't be trust, I don't believe they serve a useful function myself.

Personally I believe if we added the small GNU patch utility to Sage, it save more space than it uses. We could over time delete a lot of large files, which have only small changes from original large files.


Dave

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to