On 06/23/10 11:39 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
The difference between the toric lattice computations and the root
lattices is that the (co)weight lattices are one of the main features
of interest to the end user, while the various toric lattices are
mostly of internal use for computing something else.
I don't have a strong opinion against long-style names except that
there will be some very long names to accommodate some often-used
constructions. If nobody minds
cone.spanned_lattice_dual_quotient_by_spanned_lattice_dual_basis(supercone)
then I'll be happy to change things. Right now its
cone.M_quotient_basis(supercone) which, I agree, is not as self-
explanatory. But then, this is not something that you are dying to
compute on a normal day.
Volker
I'd prefer longer names in general. The tab completion should help reduce
excessive typing, whilst the longer name makes it clearer what it is (or it
would to a mathematician - it means nothing to me personally)
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
