On Jun 15, 5:05 pm, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > invalid/wontfix means yet another thing. "... than fixed" I presume. But #8645 is closed as "fixed", not as "invalid" or "wontfix". I observed that the issue is not "fixed", so that's why I suspected a misfiling. I don't know how important it is to keep an accurate record of the status of tickets. If the status of tickets is supposed to reflect the actual status of the system, I guess this ticket should be open with a note "this ticket can be closed when #8951 is merged" or closed "wontfix" with a note "will be fixed by merging #8951".
> There is a link tohttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8951, which is > positive > review (by you!) but was not yet merged, since 4.4.4.alpha0 was only > pos. rev. tix (right?). if that means "positive review tickets" it *should* be merged in 4.4.4, right? Actually, #8951 will not fix #8645, because that only does the ecl upgrade. The maxima.spkg linked on #8645 is supposedly superseded by #8731, which is listed as "needs work". So it looks like #8645 is listed "fixed" by a "needs work" ticket, which may be in limbo for an indefinite amount of time. Looks to me like #8645 needs reopening (done). -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
