I'm happy with the proposed change; as John points out, we already
have a sqrt() function that behaves similarly.

David

On Jun 14, 3:15 pm, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es> wrote:
> On 14 jun, 15:45, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think that sounds a good idea;  but can we call the parameter
> > "extend" and not "base_extend"?  First, as that is less frightening
> > for users (who will need examples to show that for a real matrix, if
> > you want complex eigenvalues you have to ask for them), and also for
> > consistency with (for example) the sqrt() function.
>
> > John
>
> Sure, whatever is more consistent.
>
> Miguel.

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to