I'm happy with the proposed change; as John points out, we already have a sqrt() function that behaves similarly.
David On Jun 14, 3:15 pm, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es> wrote: > On 14 jun, 15:45, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think that sounds a good idea; but can we call the parameter > > "extend" and not "base_extend"? First, as that is less frightening > > for users (who will need examples to show that for a real matrix, if > > you want complex eigenvalues you have to ask for them), and also for > > consistency with (for example) the sqrt() function. > > > John > > Sure, whatever is more consistent. > > Miguel. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org