On 05/31/10 04:26 PM, MartinX wrote:

You could try making a package using the latest (unstable) ATLAS snapshot. The
ChangeLog shows many new processors added since the release in Sage.


Successful build using ATLAS 2.9.24 directly on LAPACK 3.2.1 tar file
today - no failures running checks and timing stages which is
encouraging.

Yes

Took a long time though.

Did it give messages about tuning? It can take about 5~10x as long to build if it has to go through the tuning process

While waiting have been trying
make sense of the Sage fixes.

See my post, and this trac ticket

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9103

I am considering a build using version of LAPACK used in Sage with
ATLAS 3.8.3, but without the Sage fixes.

Martin


If it works, then clearly one of the Sage "fixes" is not too good. That would not totally surprise me.

Dave

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to