On 05/22/10 03:24 AM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
On 21 Mai, 19:42, Robert Bradshaw<rober...@math.washington.edu>
wrote:
Please let us know if you run into *any* examples of this--our goal is
to always produce standard compliant C89 or C++ code (or C99 if the
user has requested C99 complex support). Of course most Cython users
are using gcc or MSVC.
[W.r.t. Sage, not the code generated by cython:]
Just try to compile the Sage library (with gcc!) with "-ansi" added -
this very soon fails just because some people can't resist using (C99/C
++) end-of-line comments. ;-)
Take a look at $SAGE_LOCAL/include/csage/*.h....
-Leif
It would suggest to me that it would be wise to make that option the default and
sort out the issues. Then hopefully the code should be more portable.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
