On May 14, 9:54 am, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On the other hand, I am unable to replicate the very sparse benchmark > unless I assume the result will fit in 2 limbs and allocate all the > output mpz's in advance, etc. Then I can basically replicate it. If I > use my generic no assumptions code it takes about 3s. I don't think I > can improve that much if at all.
Are you allocating the coefficients one at a time? In sdmp this is amortized by allocating blocks of memory at a time. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
